Canadian construction industry remains unaffected by Temporary Foreign Worker crackdown

Canada’s construction sector has been in the spotlight following the recent announcement of cuts to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) low-wage stream by the federal Liberal government. While the construction sector, along with health care and food production, were exempted from these reductions, industry stakeholders are expressing concerns about potential future changes and are calling for broader reforms to the program.

According to Sean Strickland, executive director of Canada’s Building Trades Unions (CBTU), the TFWP has evolved into a program that allows employers to import foreign labor at cheaper wages, ultimately suppressing wages in the construction sector. Strickland emphasized the need for real reform to restore balance to the program and ensure fair wages for Canadian trades workers.

Rodrigue Gilbert, president of the Canadian Construction Association (CCA), highlighted the importance of a better immigration system to address construction workforce shortages. While the TFWP low-wage stream applies to jobs with hourly wages below the provincial median, the construction industry typically offers well-paying jobs above the median wages. The CCA continues to advocate for modernizing the immigration system to ensure the industry can access the workers needed to thrive.

In response to the recent changes to the TFWP, which include limiting the number of workers that can be hired through the low-wage stream and reducing the maximum duration of employment, industry organizations are closely monitoring the situation. It is essential to ensure that the program aligns with the needs of the construction sector and supports fair labor practices.

The Labourers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA) believes that TFWs should be phased out in favor of skilled trades workers admitted under the main economic stream, with full rights, access to union representation, and pathways to citizenship. Victoria Mancinelli, director of communications at LIUNA, emphasized the importance of safeguarding workers from exploitation and unsafe working conditions.

The CBTU is advocating for measures to end wage suppression in the construction sector, including tying prevailing wages to union wages and reviewing the International Mobility Program to prevent foreign workers from displacing Canadian workers. By taking steps to prioritize the rights and fair treatment of workers in the construction industry, stakeholders can work towards a more equitable and sustainable labor market.

Overall, the conversation surrounding the TFWP highlights the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration between industry stakeholders, government officials, and labor organizations to ensure that policies and programs support the well-being of Canadian workers and the growth of the construction sector.

Source link

Biden’s decision to withdraw injects uncertainty into foreign policy challenges including wars and trade disputes

In a surprising turn of events, Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the U.S. presidential race has left a void of uncertainty in the world, especially as Western leaders navigate conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, China’s growing assertiveness, and the rise of the far right in Europe. Biden’s departure has raised questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy and the impact on global relationships.

With Biden known for his extensive personal relationships with foreign leaders, the potential replacements on the Democratic ticket may not have the same level of experience and rapport. As messages of support pour in for Biden, the world is left to speculate on what comes next.

Israel is particularly concerned about the implications of Biden’s departure, as Vice President Kamala Harris is being eyed as a potential replacement. Israelis are analyzing Harris’s record of support for Israel and how it may differ from Biden’s historically strong stance. The future dynamic between Israel and the U.S. could shift with a new Democratic candidate in the mix.

In Ukraine, the U.S.’s military support has been a cornerstone of Biden’s legacy. While a Democratic candidate is likely to continue this support, there has been frustration over the slow pace of aid and restrictions on Western weapons. The region is bracing for potential changes as the presidential race unfolds.

China, a key player in global affairs, has been a point of contention between Biden and Trump. Both have sought to show strength against Beijing’s military and economic advancements. China’s response to the U.S. presidential race has been measured, with observers noting that the outcome may not drastically alter the relationship between the two countries.

In the Middle East, Iran’s involvement in conflicts across the region adds another layer of complexity. The U.S.’s approach to Iran, including the nuclear deal and economic sanctions, will likely be a focal point for the next administration. With a new reformist president in Iran, there are opportunities for change but also risks of escalating tensions.

The relationship between Europe, NATO, and the U.S. is also a crucial factor in global stability. While many Europeans were relieved by Trump’s departure, there is uncertainty about Biden’s decision to drop out. The future of NATO’s support for Ukraine and the handling of authoritarian states are at stake in the upcoming election.

The close ties between Mexico and the U.S. have also faced challenges in recent years, especially on issues of trade and immigration. President López Obrador’s administration has navigated these issues with both Trump and Biden, maintaining certain policies while seeking common ground. The future of U.S.-Mexico relations will depend on the outcome of the presidential election.

As the world watches the U.S. presidential race unfold, the implications for global relations are significant. From Israel to China, Ukraine to Iran, Europe to Mexico, the decisions made in Washington will shape international dynamics for years to come.

Source link